Does the electorate
speak
through
a tally of individual choices
or as
a collaboration of individuals
with
shared opinions?
Does the electorate
speak
through
a tally of individual choices
or as
a collaboration of individuals
with
shared opinions?
Is there interest in working to improve our civic circumstances?
Self governing is a blessing, yet a burden on the citizen. Together the burden may be lightened, so how could the precinct organize to encourage civic participation while minimizing the costs, of time and effort, for each individual?
Improving communications between precinct citizens has, obvious, benefits. A friend of a friend (FOAF) network could be efficient for relaying dialog between people that know each other; making it a robust and inexpensive means to disseminate and discuss civic concerns in a speedy manner. Additionally, a precinct meeting could be held at the library.
Publishing majoritively shared civic priorities provides legitimacy for deliberating with fellow citizens & electeds on public policy, spending, and taxation.
News of, by, & for the constituency: precincts, tax entities (college, conservation, schools, fire, municipality, and special districts), counties, legislative districts, and statewide. Reporting on priorities; following the flow of taxpayer dollars; tracking the current state of bills, ordinances, resolution, and public agenda items; and reporting on the coordination between different offices and levels of government.
Which candidates will publicly engage with civic participation based on precinct consensus priorities?